After a successful first year as a one-to-one laptop learning school for grades 4 through 12, we re-assessed what we had done well and the lessons we had learned before re-issuing our laptops to students for another year. Below are ten of the many lessons we learned in this new field of educational endeavor.
1. Screens are fragile. The laptop screens are more fragile than we realized. We had few problems, but the rigors of student life did result in some screen casualties. We simply continue to stress to students the incidents that have caused problems and how they can be avoided.
2. Maintain student care accountability. We had a soft rule that if a student damaged a computer, we would only re-issue a computer after any fine was paid. But it was our first year. Some damage was covered under warranty, and some was not. We were unsure what should result in a fine. In our zeal to get laptops back into the hands of the students, we were sometimes issuing fines after-the-fact. This resulted in a backlog of fines that we had to collect the following fall before re-issuing the laptops for another school year.
To do a better job, this year we intend to provide students with a loaner laptop for use only at school. When the fine is paid, the student may take the loaner home. If something later appears to be under warranty, we can always reimburse students for the fine.
3. The classroom arrangement changes. Teachers need to be more mobile. With laptops in the classroom, the guide on the side is more important than the sage on the stage. Teachers need to move around the classrooms to monitor what students are doing on their laptops. This means the teacher cannot just stand in front of the blackboard, and the arrangement of the desks may need to change to accommodate the movement.
4. Watch the power cords. Kids were terrific in caring for their laptops, but they were more cavalier when it came to caring for the power cords of the laptops. They are used to power cords and sometimes just grab the wire to pull the plug from its socket. Laptop power cords are not necessarily as durable as the cord for a lamp, and they are significantly more expensive. We continue to emphasize this to our students.
5. Teachers need not do technology every day. Some teachers, in their eagerness to be the most tech-savvy they can be, tried to make every lesson a laptop lesson. Simply put, not all lessons lend themselves to technology. Did you ever have a teacher who could absolutely captivate you with his/her story telling, and wouldn’t you like your kids to hear those same stories? Some of the best teaching can still be traditional teaching, and teachers should not overload themselves with their own high technology expectations for themselves.
6. Remove the clings. Our students were fantastic about caring for the appearance of their laptops and not using stickers, tape, or other adhesives on the laptop covers. Many took pride in their machines and purchased non-adhesive stickers (clings) to decorate their laptops. At the end of the year, we told students they could leave their stickers in place because they would each be re-issued the exact same machine in the fall. However, over the summer, some machines needed warranty work, and some pricey stickers were lost. This piqued some parents and kids. So at the end of the year, remove the clings.
7. Let the students lead. Many conscientious teachers feel they need to be the experts in the classroom. However, with this young tech generation going through the schools, teachers may never know the computers as well as the students. Teachers need to sometimes have the courage to say to the students, “Show me how this works.”
8. Watch the web usage. Although we had rules against students playing on-line games and watching silly kitten videos irrelevant to class, we were in no position to be the web police and constantly monitor what students were doing with their laptops during free time. This crimped our band width, and we had to work to make our access its most efficient. We did appeal to the kids to try to avoid during the day the videos that really gobbled up our band width.
9. Create tiers of access. Not all students are as responsible as others. In some cases, a student may violate a rule. In other cases, a parent may indicate that the student is distracted at home and unable to do school work. We created several tiers of access for the students. Our most responsible students have the fewest restrictions on their computers. It is a rewards system.
10. Emphasize professional development for teachers. We knew from what we researched up front that our whole one-to-one initiative hinged on professional development for teachers. We invested heavily in it, but we learned that the need does not really diminish over time. Ideas change. Web sites are added. Software changes. We learn. And we need to keep teaching our teachers how to get better.
O.K. Actually there are eleven lessons. The 11th we only learned after school got started this second year.
11. The new kids need to catch up. When we planned for our second year of one-to-one laptop instruction, we proceeded from the false assumption that kids are already tech-savvy and can catch on quickly. We created a boot camp for our new teachers. We learned we need a boot camp for the kids new to our school as well to help them get up to speed with the expectations of instructors.
A veteran educator and school superintendent blogs about education and school leadership along with transforming instruction through student-centered classrooms, critical thinking, and the infusion of technology.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Bosses Need to Use E-mail Carefully and Appropriately
I had a boss once who felt his number one job responsibility was to point out to every employee every time the person was any less than perfect. To be as efficient as possible in his crusade to point out our flaws, he would use all means at his disposal, i.e., private conferences, team meetings, telephone calls, voice mails, and e-mails.
There are so many things wrong with this picture, but let’s focus on just one aspect. Personnel evaluation should be about the improvement in performance of the employee. This can best be accomplished through a dialogue--an exchange of views between the supervisor and employee. Some forms of communication lend themselves to this better than others.
Modern technology makes communication easy, but this does not mean this ease is appropriate for personnel performance coaching. Teachers learning how to control student behavior are taught that they need to understand why a student violates a rule. A student may leave his/her desk or speak in class without permission, but sudden illness or a perceived emergency situation may make a breach of the rules entirely appropriate.
Certainly e-mail messages have a Reply button, but that does not mean a supervisor is getting a fair exchange of ideas after the corrective message is sent. In this context and format, a reply is likely to come across as contradiction rather than explanation. Few employees will risk such a venture, especially with an irate boss.
I need to emphasize that the communication from the boss to his or her charges should be predominantly positive feedback. At least 80 percent should be positive, supportive, and complimentary. We tend to get that which we reward, so we need to recognize what individual members of our team are doing well. Then we need to come across very strongly with the positive messages of our appreciation.
However, when mistakes are made and correction is necessary, it should be face to face with an honest and open exchange of viewpoints intended to improve overall performance and that of the organization.
If you have an example of a time a boss misused e-mail, please add it in the comments below.
There are so many things wrong with this picture, but let’s focus on just one aspect. Personnel evaluation should be about the improvement in performance of the employee. This can best be accomplished through a dialogue--an exchange of views between the supervisor and employee. Some forms of communication lend themselves to this better than others.
Modern technology makes communication easy, but this does not mean this ease is appropriate for personnel performance coaching. Teachers learning how to control student behavior are taught that they need to understand why a student violates a rule. A student may leave his/her desk or speak in class without permission, but sudden illness or a perceived emergency situation may make a breach of the rules entirely appropriate.
Certainly e-mail messages have a Reply button, but that does not mean a supervisor is getting a fair exchange of ideas after the corrective message is sent. In this context and format, a reply is likely to come across as contradiction rather than explanation. Few employees will risk such a venture, especially with an irate boss.
I need to emphasize that the communication from the boss to his or her charges should be predominantly positive feedback. At least 80 percent should be positive, supportive, and complimentary. We tend to get that which we reward, so we need to recognize what individual members of our team are doing well. Then we need to come across very strongly with the positive messages of our appreciation.
However, when mistakes are made and correction is necessary, it should be face to face with an honest and open exchange of viewpoints intended to improve overall performance and that of the organization.
If you have an example of a time a boss misused e-mail, please add it in the comments below.
Thursday, August 4, 2011
144 School Execs on Twitter
Inspired by colleague David Britten (Twitter handle: @colonelb) who recently put together a list of school superintendents who use Twitter to connect professionally with the education world, I decided to add to it, including some central office and Department of Education personnel. He cited how a growing number of professionals are using this resource for their personal development. Together we are all creating a powerful network.
Below is my list of 144 school district executives who are currently using Twitter to keep abreast of education and technology trends in the rapidly changing 21st Century. Anyone is welcome to subscribe to my curated list of these execs at @DanielLFrazier/supts .
If you are a school exec and are willing to be included in the list below, please comment on this posting. I would appreciate your contribution. We are all just trying to get better to do the best we can to serve our students.
Below is my collection (listed alphabetically by Twitter handle):
Below is my list of 144 school district executives who are currently using Twitter to keep abreast of education and technology trends in the rapidly changing 21st Century. Anyone is welcome to subscribe to my curated list of these execs at @DanielLFrazier/supts .
If you are a school exec and are willing to be included in the list below, please comment on this posting. I would appreciate your contribution. We are all just trying to get better to do the best we can to serve our students.
Below is my collection (listed alphabetically by Twitter handle):
1. anelsoneagle Allan G. Nelson
2. ATorris Andrew Torris
3. bcampbell74 Brian Campbell
4. bdavisHPS Brian Davis
5. benpettyiowa Ben Petty
6. betavt ned kirsch
7. bltg Becky Gallagher
8. Bob_Pritchard Bob Pritchard
9. BobMiller146 Bob Miller
10. bradfordgs Bradford G. Saron
11. Brianjblake Brian Blake
12. CadottSchools Joe Zydowsky
13. camalcom Cheryll Malcom
14. cbrownwgcsd Christopher Brown
15. cdsmeaton Christopher Smeaton
16. Central_Supt Dan Peterson
17. CHADMOOREHEAD CHAD MOOREHEAD
18. chadratliff Chad Ratliff
19. chrkennedy Chris Kennedy
20. cjmurra Cass Murra
21. clindhol Chris Lindholm
22. CMolumby Cathy Molumby
23. colonelb David Britten
24. D62supt D62Superintendent
25. dachelpo Don Achelpohl
26. dakeys01 Dan Keyser
27. Dan_Cox Dan_Cox
28. danaginna Dana Cole-Levesque
29. DanielLFrazier Dr Daniel L Frazier
30. danitrimble Danielle Trimble
31. davidstegall David Stegall
32. daviseidahl Davis Eidahl
33. dbark13 Dave Barker
34. DCPSTransformEd Tom Shelton
35. deborahgist Deborah A. Gist
36. demonogue Dana Monogue
37. DenMozer Dennis Mozer
38. dktrimble14 Dani Trimble
39. docwfs Walter Schartner
40. DrBradBuck Brad Buck
41. DrChrisAnderson Chris Anderson
42. DrCWJ Dr. Christie Johnson
43. drdsupt Jeff Danielsen
44. Drfredmaharry Fred Maharry
45. DrMelSmith Melody Moss Smith
46. drpaultedesco Dr. Paul Tedesco
47. DrPeteMarcelo Dr Pete Marcelo
48. drpoling Dr. Poling
49. dsheppard40 Doug Sheppard
50. DSingl Demian Singleton
51. Eckles3 Edie Eckles
52. edklamfoth Ed Klamfoth
53. edubrew Thomas Brewster
54. Edwin_Shoemate Edwin Shoemate
55. ericconti Eric Conti
56. ewilliams65 Eric Williams
57. fcdar Darwin Lehmann
58. fritcherb Bill Fritcher
59. GeorgeWelsh13 George Welsh
60. geschr Rory S. Gesch
61. gormang Greg Gorman
62. GreggSidSP Gregg Cruickshank
63. HansenMark Mark Hansen
64. haseibert H. Alan Seibert
65. herz6kids Jeff Herzberg
66. howellwright Dr. Howell Wright
67. ijoelson iner joelson
68. jasonellingson Jason Ellingson
69. jasonglassIA Jason E. Glass
70. jaynicholsfnesu Jay Nichols
71. JeffDicks Jeff Dicks
72. JereVyverberg Jere Vyverberg
73. Jhnrbbns John Robbins
74. jjonessd08 Jeff Jones
75. jmweidner jmweidner
76. joecrozier57 Joe Crozier
77. joedrake joedrake
78. JoeGothard Joe Gothard
79. johnccarver John C. Carver
80. johnjust John Just
81. jonsheldahl Jon Sheldahl
82. JRonneberg Jeff Ronneberg
83. KarlMKurt Karl Kurt
84. kenslin Kathy Enslin
85. kevenelder Keven Elder
86. kimberlymoritz Kimberly Moritz
87. kycommissioner Terry Holliday
88. Laures6 Brad
89. LCsupt Tom Hinrichs
90. lectricjacket Thomas Sperling
91. lyleschwartz Lyle Schwartz
92. m_rhee Michelle Rhee
93. m4flynn Mark Flynn
94. malloy_john John Malloy
95. mannyhwdsb Manny Figueiredo
96. MarkMNW Mark L Egli
97. MarkWhite55 Mark White
98. marthabruckner Martha Bruckner
99. MaureenBedford Maureen LaCroix
100. michaelvallely Michael Vallely Ph.D
101. mikelubelfeld Michael Lubelfeld
102. mleichliter Mike Leichliter
103. MMilesHSD2 Mike Miles
104. mp_k_suptmark Mark Schneider
105. nathanmarting Nathan Marting
106. ndcardinal Jeff Fastnacht
107. NNDSBSO Patrick Bocking
108. NorthCedar John O. Dayton
109. OskySupt Russell Reiter
110. pammoran pammoran
111. patman28580 Patrick Miller
112. paulgausman Paul Gausman
113. PellaHawk Mark Wittmer
114. principalspage principalspage
115. Rayg36 Greg Ray
116. REarleywine Rod Earleywine
117. RitaOlson Rita Olson
118. rjcordes Rob Cordes
119. RobertHollister Robert Hollister
120. RSJeffery R. Scott Jeffery
121. sai_iowa SAI - Iowa
122. sammiller29 Sam Miller
123. saraheemery Sarah Emery
124. sbenwell1 Scott Benwell
125. ScottParks ScottParks
126. scusdsupt SCUSD Superintendent
127. sfmurley stephen murley
128. ShannonJHolmes Shannon Holmes
129. SOMSDsuper Brian Osborne
130. Staudt1 Linda Staudt
131. STCSupt Kerri Nelson
132. studentscount karen Nelson
133. SuperScot Scot Graden
134. suptflanagan Mike Flanagan
135. suptsmith David Smith
136. TDOttawa Tom D'Amico
137. tebotweets David Tebo
138. timquinn5 Timothy Quinn
139. tjschutte Theron Schutte
140. Tony_Bennett Dr. Tony Bennett
141. TrishFitzGibbon Trish FitzGibbon
142. VSSupt Mary Hainstock
143. william_decker William Decker
144. wpsasstsupt Jerry Hopkins
Added 09-06-11
NoreneBunt Norene Bunt
sgrayJCSD Steve Gray
JHSTL Jere Hochman
LeydenASCI Mikkel Storaasli
scottlepke Scott Lepke
DrDaveWilk David J. Wilkerson
mrsliv Mary Jo Livingstone
MPS_Super Dr. Brian G. Ricca
acrozier22 Andy Crozier
bradjermeland Brad Jermeland
reddellp Penny Reddell
swtvsupt7 Chris Hoover
harrier007 Dr. P. D-Sweeney
danfrench Dan French
HTSSupt Alex Anemone
NoreneBunt Norene Bunt
sgrayJCSD Steve Gray
JHSTL Jere Hochman
LeydenASCI Mikkel Storaasli
scottlepke Scott Lepke
DrDaveWilk David J. Wilkerson
mrsliv Mary Jo Livingstone
MPS_Super Dr. Brian G. Ricca
acrozier22 Andy Crozier
bradjermeland Brad Jermeland
reddellp Penny Reddell
swtvsupt7 Chris Hoover
harrier007 Dr. P. D-Sweeney
danfrench Dan French
HTSSupt Alex Anemone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)